• Performance Promotion Manager at Classical Music Publisher (NY) • Executive Assistant (Woodland Hills, CA) • Sr Manager, Copyright Administration (LA) • Creative Licensing (NY)
View All Jobs
Digital Music News Breaking: TIDAL Fires CEO and 25+ Staff Members…
• Havana's Daymé Arocena Bridges Gap Between Cuban & American Music • ALL YOU CAN HEAR! • The Importance of the Latin Music Entertainment Market (part 3) • The Importance of the Latin Music Entertainment Market (part 2) • The Importance of the Latin Music Entertainment Market (part 1)
View All Entries
• Copyright Essentials: 5 Things Every Musician Should Know • Ten Lessons We Have Learned from Internet Radio, So Far ... • The DMCA License? • "Think Big" – The Next Great Copyright Act • Music of the Beltway, or why Washington matters
View All Entries
View All Copyright Corner Entries
This overview is not intended to be comprehensive or a substitute for fee-based information and/or legal advice.
Pan European Online Licensing refers to the mechanism by which one or more societies or entities, selected by a publisher and/or a songwriter, are allowed to grant European-wide licenses (rather than through separate licenses per country), and collect royalties for compositions that are digitally distributed (online or via mobile phones).
To begin, we will contrast the system in place for US writers and publishers with the system that exists in Europe. In the US, performance income is collected by the PROs (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC) and distributed to rights holders, while mechanical income (from the sale of music) is licensed and collected from music distributors either by agreement with the Harry Fox Agency (or other selected agents) or licensed and collected directly by music publishers themselves. In Europe, each country (or collection of countries) maintains a society whose purpose is to collect both mechanical and performance income and to then distribute same to songwriters, composers and music publishers.
This scheme worked adequately for music distributed country by country, but did not work well for music digitally distributed across Europe on one platform (e.g. iTunes®). Companies engaged in distributing music digitally across Europe [e.g. iTunes® (online - downloads), Nokia (Phone - downloads), and Rhapsody (streaming)] were finding it difficult to obtain licenses country by country. Broadcaster RTL and Music Choice formally complained to the European Commission. This problem was partially addressed by recommending that rights owners be permitted to select one or more societies or entities to issue one license for European-wide use.
Unfortunately, this system only works well for the reproduction right in Anglo-American repertoire (because mechanical rights are controlled per contract by publishers rather than societies). It has not yet worked well for performance rights or for compositions by songwriters outside Anglo-American countries.
The four major publishers; Sony/ATV, EMI, Universal and Warner/Chappell (see list below), have already picked their designated societies, leaving independent music publishers with a choice to designate a collection society, find themselves with complicated royalty tracking, or risk not collecting these royalties at all.
Following is a simple example to help your understanding; Let's say you, an Indie publisher, publish the song, "Believe." The song is written by your writer and a writer signed to Sony/ATV Music. You administer for your 50% publisher's share while Sony/ATV controls and administers for its 50% share. Now, Nokia requests a license for "Believe" to sell as a digital download offered on their mobile phones in Europe. Sony/ATV would license its share through GEMA (the German mechanical rights organization), their designated Pan European Online Licensor, but what about your share? You would need to designate a society to handle your similar license or find that it will be extremely complicated to find your share of royalties.
Although this scheme only applies to digital distribution, some experts believe the system will significantly impact your other agreements with foreign collection societies in other territories and with your sub-publishers. This is a very simple example - so beware that there are many other details we did not discuss that would require further investigation on your part.
SOCIETIES OFFERING PAN EUROPEAN LICENSING SOLUTIONS
If you are a service or information provider and would like to be included on this page please contact email@example.com
The CCC presents an International Round-Up
Billboard Latin Music Conference & Awards
I Create Music ASCAP EXPO
How much should writers and publishers get paid? with Rich Stumpf of Atlas Music Publishing View More
NMPA Explains the Consent Decree – Exclusive Interview with Danielle Aguirre View More
See all Articles
Tips on How to Pitch Music So You Can be successful getting placements...
by S. Straughter
View Full Post
Streaming: Some Could Be Looking At It All Wrong
by R. Merideth
View Full Post
See all Posts
3/10/15 DOJ Hearing on ASCAP/BMI Consent Decrees On the morning of March 10, 2015, the Department Of Justice (DOJ) held a hearing on the ASCAP and BMI Consent decrees. The w …
Copyright Office Report On Music Licensing Released On February 5, 2015, the Copyright Office released their 245 page report on their analysis and recommendations for how the U.S. Co …